There are 35,626 places that have a concordance with Federal Information Processing Standards
and this is one page of many
See all the other things that Who's On First holds hands with
0.012727022171 seconds{'query': {'filtered': {'filter': {'and': [{'bool': {'must_not': [{'exists': {'field': 'edtf:deprecated'}}]}}]}, 'query': {'filtered': {'filter': {'exists': {'field': 'wof:concordances.fips:code'}}, 'query': {'match_all': {}}}}}}}
Would you like try this query again to include records that have been deprecated ?
-
1108746617New Mexico — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746619New York — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746623Indiana — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746625Vermont — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746627Kansas — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746629Massachusetts — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746631Louisiana — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746633Maryland — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746635Utah — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746637Montana — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746641Idaho — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746643Hawaii — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746645Illinois — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746647Virginia — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746649Mississippi — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746651Colorado — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746653Connecticut — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746655South Carolina — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746659Arizona — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746661North Carolina — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746663Oregon — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746665Wyoming — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746667North Dakota — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746669Kentucky — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746671Rhode Island — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746673Arkansas — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746677Nebraska — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746679West Virginia — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746681Maine — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746683South Dakota — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746685Ohio — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746687Georgia — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746689California — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746691Florida — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746695Tennessee — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746697Minnesota — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746699Delaware — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746701Alaska — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746703Washington — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746705New Hampshire — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746707Iowa — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746709Texas — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746713Michigan — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746715Oklahoma — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746717Alabama — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746719Pennsylvania — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746721Wisconsin — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746723Nevada — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746725New Jersey — this is a constituency in United States -
1108746727Missouri — this is a constituency in United States -
85682393Κερύνεια — this is a region in Cyprus -
85682397Λευκωσία — this is a region in Cyprus -
85682389Αμμόχωστος — this is a region in Cyprus -
85632437Cyprus — this is a country -
85682411Λεμεσός — this is a region in Cyprus -
85682407Λάρνακα — this is a region in Cyprus -
85682401Πάφος — this is a region in Cyprus -
85670341Sal — this is a region in Cabo Verde -
85670339Boa Vista — this is a region in Cabo Verde -
85670363Ribeira Grande — this is a region in Cabo Verde -
85670311Santa Cruz — this is a region in Cabo Verde -
85670315São Salvador do Mundo — this is a region in Cabo Verde -
85670331Praia — this is a region in Cabo Verde -
85670355São Vicente — this is a region in Cabo Verde -
85670347Ribeira Brava — this is a region in Cabo Verde -
85670327Ribeira Grande de Santiago — this is a region in Cabo Verde -
85670335Maio — this is a region in Cabo Verde -
85670359Porto Novo — this is a region in Cabo Verde -
85670369Paul — this is a region in Cabo Verde -
85670321São Domingos — this is a region in Cabo Verde -
85670305São Miguel — this is a region in Cabo Verde -
85670351Tarrafal de São Nicolau — this is a region in Cabo Verde -
85670301Santa Catarina — this is a region in Cabo Verde -
85670319São Lourenço dos Órgãos — this is a region in Cabo Verde -
85670299Tarrafal — this is a region in Cabo Verde -
85670293Santa Catarina do Fogo — this is a region in Cabo Verde -
85670287Mosteiros — this is a region in Cabo Verde -
85670283São Filipe — this is a region in Cabo Verde -
85670279Brava — this is a region in Cabo Verde -
85632721Cape Verde — this is a country -
85670465Curacao — this is a region in Curaçao -
85632675Cuba — this is a country -
85670441Santiago de Cuba — this is a region in Cuba -
85670423Camagüey — this is a region in Cuba
loading facets from the sky
Log
There are 35,626 results
There are so many results for this query that the Spelunker database can't do
There are so many results for this query that the Spelunker database can't do
page1, page2, page3... style pagination without getting sad. There are actually 425 pages worth of results for this query but as of this writing there is only the "next page" of results. We all have our limits, right? Speaking of limits, these query results have a pretty short shelf life. As long as you are paging through the results everything will be okay but if left idle for too long (about 5 minutes) they will expire and you'll need to perform a new query. It's good to have constraints to work against, right?